The Destruction of Jerusalem 70AD - Proof of Christianity
- Type:
- Other > E-books
- Files:
- 1
- Size:
- 7.35 MB
- Texted language(s):
- English
- Tag(s):
- Titus Vespasian Roman Armies Jerusalem Temple 70 A.D. Jesus Christ Matthew Prophecy Destruction of Jerusalem End Times Messianic Daniel God Christianity Historicism
- Quality:
- +8 / -5 (+3)
- Uploaded:
- Sep 27, 2008
- By:
- TalmudTimmy
The Destruction of Jerusalem, an Absolute and Irresistible Proof of the Divine Origin of Christianity an examination of the massive siege on Jerusalem in the year 70 AD by the Roman General Titus and his great armies. Jewry was completely destroyed along with its Temple and Jewish institution the Sanhedrin. The event was a fulfillment of Jesus words in Matthew about the coming judgment upon the Jews for their rejection of Him - including a narrative of the calamities which befell the Jews, so far as they tend to verify Our Lord's predictions relative to that event. With a brief description of the city and temple (1812) Rare Book Notes: This book's pages have turned color: they are now all brown, with darker spots on them. Paper is very thin, there are stains throughout, and the last page, P. 143-144, exists only by its upper half, the rest was torn out.
idiot
You sure have a rather crude concept of what a proof should be. Unsurprisingly so, from somebody who peddles such pathetic junk.
Thanks Tim,
Great work. Praise be to him who came to take away the sins of the world. The perfect lamb of God!
Don't let the others blow out your flame. Most unbeleivers last words are - Oh God, forgive me!
Great work. Praise be to him who came to take away the sins of the world. The perfect lamb of God!
Don't let the others blow out your flame. Most unbeleivers last words are - Oh God, forgive me!
I remind you Tim that the Jews are Gods chosen people. We need to Love all our brothers and let them know that they too can have salvation through Christ.
I agree that we are to evangelize the Jews, but the Jews are NOT the chosen people of God. That is not scriptural.
Although many think that the destruction of Jerusalem was the revalation of John but if you listen to this mp3 you may get a different perspective
You can listen by pasting this link into your browser.
http://bttb.edgeboss.net/download/bttb/bttb/transcripts/audio/mp3/bb-2007-11-05.mp3
You can listen by pasting this link into your browser.
http://bttb.edgeboss.net/download/bttb/bttb/transcripts/audio/mp3/bb-2007-11-05.mp3
Bro, the 70 weeks of Daniel are finished. It takes mental gymnastics to conclude that God would mysteriously and without reason separate the 70th from the 69th week. The Early Church did not believe this.
IN the prophecy of Daniel, the "prince that shall come" was a reference to General Titus coming under the will of God to judge and destroy Israel the harlot.
Daniel and Matthew 24 are closely related.
IN the prophecy of Daniel, the "prince that shall come" was a reference to General Titus coming under the will of God to judge and destroy Israel the harlot.
Daniel and Matthew 24 are closely related.
PhXAnarchy likes things to be stuck up his ass. Fucking loser boy....
How is it crude when Jesus specifically said Jerusalem would be encompassed by armies and trodden down by the gentiles?
TalmudTimmy can you (and anybody who can) please re-seed this book.
Thanks
Thanks
Comments